Part I
General

CHAPTER I
Subject-matter, scope and general principles of international judicial co-operation in criminal matters


Article 19
Non his in idem

Where a request for international co-operation is granted that carries delegation of competence over criminal proceedings to a foreign judicial authority, criminal proceedings shall neither be initiated nor continued in Portugal for the same facts that substantiated the request; neither shall a sentence, the enforcement of which has been delegated to a foreign judicial authority, be enforced m Portugal.

Part III
Transfer of criminal proceedings

CHAPTER I
Delegation of competence in criminal proceedings in favour of the Portuguese judicial authorities


Article 80
Specific requirements

1. Criminal proceedings may be taken or continued in Portugal for an act committed outside the Portuguese territory, subject to the general requirements provided for in this law, as well as the specific requirements that follow:

b) the foreign State must have provided guarantees that it shall not take proceedings against the person concerned, for the same facts, if a final judgement is rendered by a Portuguese court in respect of the same person and for the same facts;

Part III
Transfer of criminal proceedings

CHAPTER I
Delegation of competence in criminal proceedings in favour of the Portuguese judicial authorities


Article 82
Effects in the requesting State

1. The acceptance by Portugal of a request made by a foreign State implies that the latter relinquishes the proceedings for the same facts.

2. Once criminal proceedings are taken or continued in Portugal, the requesting State, after having been duly notified that the person left the Portuguese territory, regains the right to prosecute that person for the same facts.

Part I
General

CHAPTER I
Subject-matter, scope and general principles of international judicial co-operation in criminal matters

Article 8
Discontinuation of criminal proceedings

1. Co-operation shall not be admissible where, either in Portugal or in another State in which criminal proceedings concerning the same facts have been initiated :

a) Either the proceedings ended with a final sentence of acquittal, or were otherwise definitively discontinued ;
b) either the sentence was carried out, or it cannot be carried out according to the law of the State in which it was passed ;
c) the criminal proceedings were discontinued on any other grounds, unless an international convention provides that discontinuation of proceedings under such grounds does not prevent the requested State from engaging in co-operation.

2. The provisions of sub-paragraphs a) and b) of the preceding paragraph shall have no effect where the request by the foreign authority is made for purposes of the judicial review of a sentence and the grounds for such a review are identical to those that are provided for under Portuguese law.

3. The provisions of sub-paragraph a) of paragraph 1 above shall not preclude co-operation where the latter is sought for the purpose of re-opening proceedings, in accordance with the law.

Part I
General

CHAPTER I
Subject-matter, scope and general principles of international judicial co-operation in criminal matters

Article 19
Non his in idem

Where a request for international co-operation is granted that carries delegation of competence over criminal proceedings to a foreign judicial authority, criminal proceedings shall neither be initiated nor continued in Portugal for the same facts that substantiated the request ; neither shall a sentence, the enforcement of which has been delegated to a foreign judicial authority, be enforced m Portugal.

Part III
Transfer of criminal proceedings

CHAPTER I
Delegation of competence in criminal proceedings in favour of the Portuguese judicial authorities

Article 80
Specific requirements

1. Criminal proceedings may be taken or continued in Portugal for an act committed outside the Portuguese territory, subject to the general requirements provided for in this law, as well as the specific requirements that follow :

b) the foreign State must have provided guarantees that it shall not take proceedings against the person concerned, for the same facts, if a final judgement is rendered by a Portuguese court in respect of the same person and for the same facts ;

Part III
Transfer of criminal proceedings

CHAPTER I
Delegation of competence in criminal proceedings in favour of the Portuguese judicial authorities

Article 82
Effects in the requesting State

1. The acceptance by Portugal of a request made by a foreign State implies that the latter relinquishes the proceedings for the same facts.

2. Once criminal proceedings are taken or continued in Portugal, the requesting State, after having been duly notified that the person left the Portuguese territory, regains the right to prosecute that person for the same facts.

Part IV
Enforcement of criminal judgements

CHAPTER I
Enforcement of foreign criminal judgements

Article 101
Applicable law ; effects of enforcement

8. As soon as enforcement begins in Portugal, the requesting State must relinquish its right to enforce the same judgement ; the right of enforcement shall however revert to the latter State (a) where the sentenced person escapes and (b) where that State is informed that the sentence, if it involves the payment of a sum of money cannot be totally or partially enforced.

Article 20
Ne bis in idem
1. Except as provided in this Statute, no person shall be tried before the Court with respect to conduct which formed the basis of crimes for which the person has been convicted or acquitted by the Court.
2. No person shall be tried by another court for a crime referred to in article 5 for which that person has already been convicted or acquitted by the Court.
3. No person who has been tried by another court for conduct also proscribed under article 6, 7 or 8 shall be tried by the Court with respect to the same conduct unless the proceedings in the other court:
(a) Were for the purpose of shielding the person concerned from criminal responsibility for crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court; or
(b) Otherwise were not conducted independently or impartially in accordance with the norms of due process recognized by international law and were conducted in a manner which, in the circumstances, was inconsistent with an intent to bring the person concerned to justice.