'Trials in absentia' in document 'Azerbaijan - Criminal Procedure Code'

Jump to:

RELEVANT SECTIONS OF THE IMPLEMENTING LEGISLATION

SPECIAL PART

SECTION EIGHT
PROCEEDINGS IN THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

Chapter XLI
GENERAL CONDITIONS GOVERNING COURT HEARINGS

Article 311. Participation of the accused in the court’s examination of the case and consequences of non-attendance

311.1. During the court’s examination of the case, the accused shall participate in all the hearings of the court and shall enjoy the rights provided for in Article 91.5 and 91.6 of this Code.

311.2. A court may examine a case without the participation of the accused only in the following exceptional circumstances :

311.2.1. if the accused is outside the territory of the Azerbaijan Republic and intentionally avoids attendance at court ;
311.2.2. if a person charged with an offence which does not pose a major public threat applies for the charges against him to be examined without his participation, on condition that this does not preclude a thorough, full and objective examination of all the circumstances connected with the criminal prosecution.

311.3. If the court examines the case without the participation of the accused, the participation of his defence counsel in the hearing shall be compulsory.

311.4. Save in the circumstances provided for in Article 311.2 of this Code, if the accused fails to attend the hearing, the court’s examination of the case shall be postponed and the hearing shall be conducted at another time.

311.5. If the accused fails to attend the hearing without good reason, he may be forcibly brought to the hearing by court decision, and if there are grounds for it under this Code, a restrictive measure may be applied to him or an existing restrictive measure may be altered to a more serious one.

RELEVANT ROME STATUTE PROVISIONS

Article 63
Trial in the presence of the accused
1. The accused shall be present during the trial.

Article 67
Rights of the accused
1. In the determination of any charge, the accused shall be entitled to a public hearing, having regard to the provisions of this Statute, to a fair hearing conducted impartially, and to the following minimum guarantees, in full equality:
(a) To be informed promptly and in detail of the nature, cause and content of the charge, in a language which the accused fully understands and speaks;
(b) To have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of the defence and to communicate freely with counsel of the accused’s choosing in confidence;
(c) To be tried without undue delay;
(d) Subject to article 63, paragraph 2, to be present at the trial, to conduct the defence in person or through legal assistance of the accused’s choosing, to be informed, if the accused does not have legal assistance, of this right and to have legal assistance assigned by the Court in any case where the interests of justice so require, and without payment if the accused lacks sufficient means to pay for it;
(e) To examine, or have examined, the witnesses against him or her and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his or her behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him or her. The accused shall also be entitled to raise defences and to present other evidence admissible under this Statute;
(f) To have, free of any cost, the assistance of a competent interpreter and such translations as are necessary to meet the requirements of fairness, if any of the proceedings of or documents presented to the Court are not in a language which the accused fully understands and speaks;
(g) Not to be compelled to testify or to confess guilt and to remain silent, without such silence being a consideration in the determination of guilt or innocence;
(h) To make an unsworn oral or written statement in his or her defence; and
(i) Not to have imposed on him or her any reversal of the burden of proof or any onus of rebuttal.
2. In addition to any other disclosure provided for in this Statute, the Prosecutor shall, as soon as practicable, disclose to the defence evidence in the Prosecutor’s possession or control which he or she believes shows or tends to show the innocence of the accused, or to mitigate the guilt of the accused, or which may affect the credibility of prosecution evidence. In case of doubt as to the application of this paragraph, the Court shall decide.