'Competing request - same conduct' in document 'Uganda - ICC Act 2010'

Jump to:

RELEVANT SECTIONS OF THE IMPLEMENTING LEGISLATION

Part IV – Arrest and Surrender of Person to ICC

Surrender and Delivery Orders

41. Competing requests.

(2) Where the requesting state is a party to the Statute, priority shall be given to the request from the ICC if the ICC has determined under articles 18 or 19 of the Statute that the case is admissible; and where an admissibility decision is still pending, no person may be extradited under the Extradition Act until the ICC makes a decision on admissibility and determines that the case is inadmissible.

Part IV – Arrest and Surrender of Person to ICC

Surrender and Delivery Orders

41. Competing requests.

(3) Where the requesting state is not a party to the Statute, priority shall be given to the request for surrender from the ICC, if Uganda is not under an international obligation to extradite the person to the requesting state and the ICC has determined under article 18 or 19 of the Statute that the case is admissible.

RELEVANT ROME STATUTE PROVISIONS

Article 90
Competing requests
3. Where a determination under paragraph 2 (a) has not been made, the requested State may, at its discretion, pending the determination of the Court under paragraph 2 (b), proceed to deal with the request for extradition from the requesting State but shall not extradite the person until the Court has determined that the case is inadmissible. The Court's determination shall be made on an expedited basis.
4. If the requesting State is a State not Party to this Statute the requested State, if it is not under an international obligation to extradite the person to the requesting State, shall give priority to the request for surrender from the Court, if the Court has determined that the case is admissible.