GENERAL PART
Chapter VIII. CIRCUMSTANCES EXCLUDING CRIMINALITY OF AN ACT
Article 37. Misread defense
1. The misread defense shall mean actions resulting in a harm caused in the absence of any real socially dangerous trespass where the person, who misinterpreted actions of the victim's, only mistakenly presumed the reality of such trespass.
2. The misread defense shall exclude any criminal liability for the harm caused only if the circumstances involved furnished reasonable grounds for the person to believe that there was a real trespass and that person was not and could not be aware that his/her presumption was mistaken.
3. Where a person was not and could not be aware that his/her presumption was mistaken, but acted in excess of defense justifiable under the circumstances of a real trespass, that person shall be criminally liable for the excess of necessary defense.
4. Where a person, under the circumstances, was not aware of, but ought to realize the absence of a real socially dangerous trespass, that person shall be criminally liable for the harm caused by recklessness.
Article 38. Apprehension of an offender
1. Any actions of the victim or other persons immediately following a trespass and aimed at the apprehending of the offender and bringing him or her to appropriate public authorities and were not in excess of what was necessary for such apprehension, are not deemed to be criminal.
2. Any willful infliction, upon an offender, of grievous harm clearly disproportionate to the danger of the trespass or circumstances involved in the apprehension of the offender, is held to be in excess of measures necessary for the apprehension. The excess of measures necessary for the apprehension of an offender shall entail criminal liability only in cases specifically provided for in Articles 118 and 124 of this Code.
Unique provision - defences
Other defences - national proceedings
EDIT.