PART IV
EVIDENCE, ACTIONS TO PROVE
CHAPTER TWELVE
ACTIVITIES OF PROOF
Article 94. Verification of Evidence
94.1. An inquiry officer, investigator, procurator and court shall be obligated to review collected
evidences comprehensively and objectively.
94.2. Evidence collected in a case can be verified by way of comparative analysis, comparing with
other evidences, collecting new evidence, and verifying the source of the evidence.
Article 95. Evaluation of Evidence
95.1. An inquiry officer, investigator, prosecutor and court shall evaluate all the evidences in their
entirety in order to determine whether the evidences which are relevant to a case and which were obtained according to law, are sufficient for reviewing and resolving the case.
95.2. In evaluating an evidence an inquiry officer, investigator, procurator, and judge, shall take law
and legal consciousness as a guidance and evaluate the evidence by their inner conviction, based on comprehensive, thorough, complete and objective review of the evidence.
95.3. For an inquiry officer, investigator, procurator and judge there shall be no evidence previously
established as being inexorably true.
95.4. There shall be no necessity to reprove facts which has been already established by a court
decision which took legal effect, but this provision shall not apply for reopening of a case based on newly discovered circumstances.
Admissibility of evidence - national proceedings
EDIT.